What is hope? In 1861, Emily Dickinson composed the most enduring definition: hope is the “thing with feathers that perches in the soul.” Over a century and a half later, Anne Lamott wrote hope was the belief that even in the desert you could still find “life, wildflowers, fossils, sources of water.” For poet of politics Rebecca Solnit, hope exists at the crossroads of “might” and “might not.” We might repair our broken republic; we might eliminate small-mindedness and bigotry; we might recover our lost democratic ideals. However, hope is pragmatic enough to know possibilities are not certainties. Though we might break the oppressive silence surrounding sexual assault, though we might pass stricter gun control laws and finally put a stop to senseless mass shootings, we might not. Whether or not we do depends on us.
Our ability to redirect the course of history is what Solnit explores in her consciousness-raising 2018 essay collection Call Them By Their True Names. Required reading for anyone concerned about the state of American democracy, Call Them By Their True Names is wide-ranging, covering topics as diverse as the impotence of anger, the importance of using language to preserve truth rather than disseminate fabrications and falsehoods, and the responsibility of journalists to challenge the status quo and rewrite the world’s broken stories. Though today -isms threaten to topple our very democracy, Solnit never resigns to despair. Despite Donald Trump and the alt right, despite fake news and distorted facts, despite melting ice caps and the impending threat of global warming, Solnit remains hopeful; indeed, hope is the bedrock of all her writing.
In one of the collection’s most beautifully buoyant essays, “In Praise of Indirect Consequences,” Solnit asserts hope implies responsibility. Unlike optimism, which believes humanity will undoubtedly have a happy ending, or cynicism, which maintains we’re doomed, hope says the future will be determined by what we do (or don’t do):
“Optimism assumes that all will go well without our effort; pessimism assumes it’s all irredeemable; both let us stay home and do nothing. Hope for me has meant a sense that the future is unpredictable, and that we don’t actually know what will happen, but know we may be able to write it ourselves.
Hope is a belief that what we do might matter, an understanding that the future is not yet written. It’s an informed, astute open-mindedness about what can happen and what role we might play in it. Hope looks forward but draws its energies from the past, from knowing histories, including our victories, and their complexities and imperfections. It means not fetishizing the perfect that is the enemy of the good, not snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, not assuming you know what will happen when the future is unwritten, and part of what happens is up to us.”
In our near-sighted age, it’s difficult to magnify the telescope of our perspective and clearly see into the distance. Big businesses pollute our skies and poison our oceans because they consider short-term profit rather than long-term environmental consequences. Wall Street bankers exploit others to afford the excesses of a lavish lifestyle: extravagant parties, flashy Ferraris, luxurious multi-million dollar penthouses— they think nothing of how their reckless decisions will later affect the economy. But our choices in the present— from the most significant to the smallest, most seemingly inconsequential— will be felt for years to come. A flap of a butterfly’s wings can set off a tsunami halfway across the world.
History belongs not just to monumental events and larger-than-life personalities but to commonplace moments and ordinary people. As Leo Tolstoy once said, history is shaped by “an infinitely large number of infinitesimally small actions.” The lyrical Ms. Solnit agrees: the little things we do today can reverberate for centuries. Even when a political campaign or social movement appears to be a “failure” from the limited perspective of our particular moment in history, it may be a triumph in the grander scheme of things. For example, though British suffragettes didn’t win the right to vote until 1928, their early activism would go on to inspire Gandhi who, of course, would go on to inspire Martin Luther King. His philosophy of non-violence would later influence activists in South Africa and protestors in the Arab Spring:
“Ideas are contagious, emotions are contagious, hope is contagious, courage is contagious. When we embody those qualities, or their opposites, we convey them to others. That is to say, British suffragists, who won limited access to the vote for women in 1918 and full access in 1928, played a part in inspiring an Indian man who, twenty years later, led the liberation of the Asian subcontinent from British rule. He, in turn, inspired a Black man in the American South to study his ideas and their application. After a 1959 pilgrimage to India to meet with Gandhi’s heirs, Martin Luther King wrote, ‘While the Montgomery boycott was going on, India’s Gandhi was the guiding light of our technique of nonviolent social change. We spoke of him often.’ Those techniques, further developed by the civil rights movement, were taken up around the world, including in the struggle against apartheid, at one end of the African continent, and in the Arab Spring, at the other.”
Solnit concludes by citing great French philosopher and social theorist Michael Foucault: “People know what they do; frequently they know why they do what they do; but what they don’t know is what what they do does,” he wrote. Using the lovely metaphor of a tree, Solnit suggests the seeds of our actions can take root and blossom in miraculous, unexpected ways:
“You do what you can. What you’ve done may do more than you can imagine for generations to come. You plant a seed and a tree grows from it; will there be fruit, shade, habitat for birds, more seeds, a forest, wood to build a cradle or a house? You don’t know. A tree can live much longer than you. So will an idea, and sometimes the changes that result from accepting that new idea about what is true, or right, just might remake the world. You do what you can do; you do your best; what what you do does is not up to you.”
How many of us have turned on the news and felt like we lived in a doomsday dystopia of racism and misogyny? of discord and division? of mistrust and acrimony? We live in an age of white supremacy and anti-immigrant hysteria, police brutality and mass shootings. Yet Solnit insists we can still shift the tides of history.
4 thoughts on “Rebecca Solnit on Hope, Hindsight & How Our Choices Can Redirect the Course of History”